I’ve been thinking a bunch about how we judge each other. And how we have built-in infrastructure that does it in the most cruelly effective way.
I’m speaking of the Neanderthalic thumbs up, thumbs down. No disrespect to Siskel & Ebert, the movie critics who ended their reviews by summing everything up with a thumbs up or thumbs down, and actually trademarked the phrase “two thumbs up.” They were professionals, after all, hired to give viewers their perspective. If we were going to plunk down our hard-earned cash on a movie, we wanted a clear sign that it would be worth it.
We wanted a thumbs up.
But now many platforms made to share creativity have adopted the thumbs up/thumbs down rating system. And here is why that poses a problem to that very creativity they are hoping to spawn. Younger creatives, and hell, even older ones with seemingly thicker skin but tender hearts, focus their own self worth based on the number of ups or downs a posted project receives. I know some really creative young people (ahem) who have removed good content because there were too many thumbs down. Or, even more tragically, decided what to create based on what gets positive reviews.
Isn’t that bass-ackwards? Shouldn’t we be suggesting to young kids that they should create what comes from within, and find their own worth within the creation and not the feedback loop? Does it really matter what other people think?
I mean, I don’t care what you think, but what do you think?